For health, doctors have more knowledge than ordinary people. As a result, many rumors also like the banner of "Doctors Say". For example, there is an article on the Internet that said: doctors will never eat "captive squid, artificial ripening milk, canned tomato sauce, non-organic potatoes, beef and corn feed." Does the doctor really eat these five kinds of food? Let's analyze them one by one. Captive squid The article declares that “feeding them with feed, broken soybeans, and poultry manure causes a large amount of toxins to accumulate in the body of salmon, which is equivalent to eating these toxins after being eaten by people. At the same time, the nutritional value of captive squids is also generally lower than In the wild, the study found that eating squid in captivity often increases the prevalence of cancer.†In fact, if the feed to be fed contains a lot of toxins, then the first thing that affects is the growth of the fish, and the farmers' losses are even greater. Processed poultry manure can be used as feed to feed fish and even livestock to provide nutrition. Some of the nutritional indicators of farmed fish will be less than those of the wild, and some indicators are more than the wild. Overall, there will be no conclusion that “nutrition value is generally worse than wildâ€. As for the "prevalence of cancers in captive squid often increased," it is purely a matter of mouth. The biggest difference between farmed fish and wild fish is that antibiotics may be used in the breeding process. If the use is not standardized, the antibiotic residue may exceed the standard; wild fish grow slowly and grow for a long time, and heavy metals may exceed the standard. Non-organic potatoes The reason why the non-organic potatoes can't be eaten is that “potatoes absorb herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides from the soil during the growth process.†In agricultural cultivation, the standardized use of herbicides, insecticides and bactericides is sufficient to have a corresponding effect, and their residual content will not endanger health. There has been a large amount of test data showing that there is no substantial difference in safety and nutrition between organic products and conventional products. Canned tomato sauce The reason why the article says that it cannot be eaten is that "the resin in the liner contains bisphenol A." Bisphenol A is an additive for the production of epoxy resins, which is a lining for many metal containers. In theory, bisphenol A can migrate into foods, but so far, all safety bottle evaluation experiments have not shown that bisphenol A that migrated through this route can reach the level of health hazards. The FDA expressed in its updated bisphenol A information in July 2014 their current attitude toward food exposure to bisphenol A: The dose of bisphenol A present in food is safe. Of course, bisphenol A, after all, has the potential to "hazard to health," and there are technical alternatives that do not apply it. “There is no need to use†and “Minimize use†is a conservative and conservative measure, but it does not mean that foods that use bisphenol A cans are hazardous to health. Corn beef The article states that “Bull is a natural herbivore, but in order to make cattle grow faster, farmers use corn or soybeans as a feed for cattle. This will lead to lower nutritional value of beef, and increase in fat content, resulting in the human body more susceptible to Upper cardiovascular disease." "The cow is grazing," because wild cattle do not eat nutritious feed. Cows, like other livestock, grow faster with richer nutrients. Corn- and soy-based feeds ensure that the full nutrition needed for cattle growth will only make beef “more nutritionally valuableâ€. The so-called "bovine fat content increase, resulting in the body is more susceptible to cardiovascular disease" is a very rogue accusation. In the case of beef, the higher the fat content, the better the taste and the more popular it is for consumers. The excessive intake of fat is not conducive to cardiovascular health, because people are not enough control. We can say that such beef should be “not healthy enoughâ€, but it is too unreasonable to leave “the disease of the cardiovascular system†to the “cow of cornâ€. Artificially ripened milk The so-called "artificial ripening milk" is actually using bovine growth hormone in the breeding process to promote milk production. As for “this hormone can cause cow's breast infection,†it is not a hormone that causes an infection, but the injection process can lead to infection, which is the same as any injection that increases the chance of infection. The article states that “growth hormone will produce an insulin analogue in milk, and long-term consumption of milk with high insulin analogue will increase the risk of cancer in humansâ€, and the insulin analogue here is actually IGF-1. The milk originally contains IGF-1, and the content of different milk is high or low. The US FDA conducted a comprehensive evaluation of growth hormones for milking. The conclusion is that the average amount of IGF-1 in milk using growth hormone is slightly higher, but this “slightly†amplitude is normal fluctuations in IGF-1. Within the scope, there is no effect on human health. Finally, China has not approved the use of growth hormone to increase milk production. Guangzhou Zhongzhinan Supply Chain Co.,Ltd. , https://www.zhongzhinanlighting.com