If the melamine incident destroys the people's confidence in the dairy industry, then the "clouding incident" may have destroyed people's confidence in the entire beverage industry; if the melamine incident makes people's trust in the Chinese authorities fall to a low point, then " The “clouding agent incident†made people wonder: Faced with the endless falsification of modern industrial society, can the food and food supervision system really protect the public? Compared with the melamine incident, the clouding agent incident did not cause much damage. This is considered a blessing fortunes. The reason why these incidents received so much attention was because people's attention and ability to health have been greatly improved, followed by the large scale of modern production methods. A business failure can affect countless people. In addition, the ability of modern society to disseminate information is strong, and any information can be spread throughout the world in a short period of time. Imagine that two hundred years ago, someone had put poison in food. The victims were most likely to be near a few streets, and it was unlikely that they would affect one city to another. In addition, if someone adds little or no harm to food, people find it almost impossible. If we look back at the clouding agent incident. First, someone discovered the doubts in the food. Just as this person was a food testing person, she went deep into the doubt and finally discovered the presence of illegal additives plasticizers. Immediately, the competent department in Taiwan announced the situation, detected products that might be affected, and ordered the recall of untested products. Then the rest of the world followed suit to detect plasticizers in food. Although the public in Taiwan broke out and even questioned their competent authorities. However, it seems to me that the discovery and solution of problems still depend on the modern food supervision system. If there is no routine food testing procedure, doubts will not be found; without modern detection techniques, problems cannot be identified. The question is not whether or not to trust this system, but - we can only rely on this system. The real problem is that such a regulatory system is implemented by humans. The quality of the implementation determines what kind of protection the public can provide. For example, melamine was found in pet feed exported to the United States prior to the discovery of melamine harm. If the competent authority is responsible enough - just like the Taiwanese technician who found the plasticizer added to the drink, he will not give up doubts because he is "not in the inspection project." The existence of melamine will be discovered very early, thus avoiding much The child is further victimized. For quality technicians, after knowing why melamine is added to pet feed, it is almost logical to think of possible additions in dairy products. If "melamine added to dairy products" is really "an open secret in the industry", then the supervisory department will use "not in the inspection project" to shirk it, and it can be counted as dereliction of duty. Whether it is China or the United States, the current regulatory system cannot guarantee "absolute security" as the public hopes. At present, the so-called supervision is still focused on penalizing the violators by "punishing them." However, on the one hand, there are always people taking risks, which is always a matter of the cost of cat-mouse games and crime. On the other hand, food production "negligent accidents" are difficult to avoid and can only be reduced through the management of the production process. The higher the safety factor, the higher the production cost. At present, China's regulatory system, the former is poorly managed, and crime costs are low; while the latter, it is almost a blank. In the face of frequent food safety problems, the public's doubts and grief over the regulatory authorities are understandable. But leaving the regulatory authorities aside and counting on other ways to ensure food safety is completely unrealistic. Responding to anger can not solve any problems. Whether we want to or not, valuable efforts are still trying to improve it. Injectable Skin Rejuvenating Solution Jiangsu Tiera Biotechnology Co., Ltd , https://www.tierabio.com